Feminist Myths and Michelle Obama
The Daily Mail quoted Dr Catherine Hakim, running a short piece headed ‘Feminist myths “are making equality laws unfair to men”’. Quite rightly, Hakim’s work has drawn attention to intra-category variation: that ‘women’ are not all the same, and certainly not all women who choose to work are the same: ‘The most misleading feminist myth is that women are united in their goals and priorities’. The Mail article concludes by summarising her latest findings that ‘while women could choose between work and family, men had fewer choices’. Representing this apparente difference in this way is not the whole story though. Wider range of choice doesn’t necessarily equate to better or more equal choices, nor does it interrogate the reasons for or consequences of work-life choices for groups of women and mean. ‘Feminist myths’ are presented as the problem – not the real life inequalities experienced by real people in real contexts. Is recognising this the same as getting my nail file out as Gerald Warner puts it?
Flick on a few pages in the Daily Mail and the outcome of the American election features in several articles. Michelle Obama is not without mention. Never mind the momentous implications of Barack Obama’s success, the British press is all too ready to focus its critique on Michelle Obama’s wardrobe. I’m not going to repeat the exact quotations here (in my opinion, they are irritating banal). Nonetheless, perhaps this persistent and stereotypical representation of a newsworthy female figure reminds us why questions about ‘myths of difference’ continue to evoke interest.